President Barack Obama’s nominee to fill a Supreme Court vacancy has yet another tie to Connecticut. She sided against a student in the infamous “douche bag” case, and that has upset some free-speech advocates.
In August 2007, Judge Sonia Sotomayor sat on a panel that ruled against an appeal in Doninger v. Niehoff.
Avery Doninger was disqualified from running for school government at Lewis S. Mills High School in Burlington after she posted something on her blog, referring to the superintendent and other officials as "douche bags" because they canceled a battle of the bands she had helped to organize.
The case went to court and in March 2008, Sotomayor was on a panel that heard Doninger’s mother’s appeal alleging her daughter’s free speech and other rights were violated. Her mother wanted to prevent the school from barring her daughter from running.
Sotomayor joined two other judges from the 2nd Circuit in ruling that the student’s off-campus blog remarks created a “foreseeable risk of substantial disruption” at the student’s high school and that the teenager was not entitled to a preliminary injunction reversing a disciplinary action against her, Education Week reports.
This is disappointing, to say the least, to a fervent advocate of free speech and consistent opponent of douche bags.
One of the world's largest magazine publishers appears to be having second thoughts about giving away most of its articles on the Internet.
Time Warner CEO Jeffrey Bewkes told an investor conference Friday that he doesn't think it makes much sense for publishers to provide their content without a way to recover the production costs.
But Bewkes didn't say whether Time Warner's magazine group, which includes Time, People and Sports Illustrated, is considering charging fees for access to its Web sites.
Hey, it worked great for the New York Times, right? You all are still paying for TimesSelect, right?
Who in their right minds would pay for garbage like People online when much better content like WWTDD is free? And Time? It's a worthless roundup of news stories, the same thing you can get on the front page of Yahoo News or Google News. It's not as interesting or timely as Drudge.
The Economist successfully charges for some content, but that's because it actually has exceptionally good, original writing. Time Warner has no hope of ever attracting that type of talent, or readers literate enough to appreciate it.
Under President Barack Obama’s budget plan, the federal debt is exploding. To be precise, it is rising – and will continue to rise – much faster than gross domestic product, a measure of America’s ability to service it. The federal debt was equivalent to 41 per cent of GDP at the end of 2008; the Congressional Budget Office projects it will increase to 82 per cent of GDP in 10 years. With no change in policy, it could hit 100 per cent of GDP in just another five years.
“A government debt burden of that [100 per cent] level, if sustained, would in Standard & Poor’s view be incompatible with a triple A rating,” as the risk rating agency stated last week.
I believe the risk posed by this debt is systemic and could do more damage to the economy than the recent financial crisis. To understand the size of the risk, take a look at the numbers that Standard and Poor’s considers. The deficit in 2019 is expected by the CBO to be $1,200bn (€859bn, £754bn). Income tax revenues are expected to be about $2,000bn that year, so a permanent 60 per cent across-the-board tax increase would be required to balance the budget. Clearly this will not and should not happen. So how else can debt service payments be brought down as a share of GDP?
Inflation will do it. But how much? To bring the debt-to-GDP ratio down to the same level as at the end of 2008 would take a doubling of prices. That 100 per cent increase would make nominal GDP twice as high and thus cut the debt-to-GDP ratio in half, back to 41 from 82 per cent. A 100 per cent increase in the price level means about 10 per cent inflation for 10 years. But it would not be that smooth – probably more like the great inflation of the late 1960s and 1970s with boom followed by bust and recession every three or four years, and a successively higher inflation rate after each recession.
I've written before about America's slow puncture plan to rip off its lenders, but inflation is no picnic for Americans either. It's easy to cause commodity inflation by printing money, but wage inflation will not keep up, because America is already a high-cost labor area in an increasingly global marketplace. Imagine your food, gasoline, durable goods, and utility costs doubling in a few years, while your paycheck increases only marginally or not at all, if you're lucky enough to still have a job.
Obama may make the Carter years look like a party.
Prospective clients will be glad to know that Donna has resurfaced as Donna Gold-Bentzel at donnagold-realtor.com, and she still has those lovely properties for rent. And she has even taken our advice: that 2-bedroom condo we said was overpriced at $5100 per month? She's dropped it to just $3800 per month! Too bad there are still 2-bedroom condos in the same building for $1800, $1850, $1900, and $1950!
"I feel that I have a unique understanding of the Real Estate market and hope that you will call me for any of your Real Estate needs."
With budget deficits soaring and President Obama pushing a trillion-dollar-plus expansion of health coverage, some Washington policymakers are taking a fresh look at a money-making idea long considered politically taboo: a national sales tax.
Common around the world, including in Europe, such a tax -- called a value-added tax, or VAT -- has not been seriously considered in the United States. But advocates say few other options can generate the kind of money the nation will need to avert fiscal calamity.
At a White House conference earlier this year on the government's budget problems, a roomful of tax experts pleaded with Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner to consider a VAT. A recent flurry of books and papers on the subject is attracting genuine, if furtive, interest in Congress. And last month, after wrestling with the White House over the massive deficits projected under Obama's policies, the chairman of the Senate Budget Committee declared that a VAT should be part of the debate.
I'm in favor of a VAT tax in principle -- if it replaces the income tax. That which you tax, you discourage. We should be discouraging consumption, not work, savings and investment.
As for the regressive aspect, don't panic. You can give every family a refund check to cover the VAT on the first $40,000 or so of spending, so that the poor pay no taxes and the middle class have a healthy exemption too. Then a VAT tax in the teen percentages replaces the income tax. I would take that deal in a heartbeat.
Of course Pelosi and Obama can't be trusted with a VAT tax. Their maniacal spending would require a VAT tax in addition to outrageous income taxes.
Imagine my disappointment when the best part of the call was deleted from the audio.
Here's what they cut out:
“Ja! The vibrating strength on these new phones is sooo amazing! Ja, I mean, when you’re driving, you can stick one right in your scheisse-hole and stimulate the prostate very nicely.”
The weird thing is this isn't just censorship of a prankster; it's journalistic fraud. By leaving the rest of the call there and presenting it seriously, they are deceiving their listeners into believing the story about how a German contractor's business has been transformed by cell phone technology.
Daniel from Hamburg, I know you recorded the call. Please e-mail me the audio file!
The U.S. delinquency rate jumped to a seasonally adjusted 9.12 percent and the share of loans entering foreclosure rose to 1.37 percent, the Mortgage Bankers Association said today. Both figures are the highest in records going back to 1972.
Free rent for deadbeat homeowners. If the banks are going to delay foreclosure for at least a year due to political pressure, operational capacity, or a desire to delay loss recognition, you might as well take advantage of it, stop paying your mortgage, and live free for a year. And that's exactly what homedebtors are doing. Incentives, people. Incentives.
Bonus question: how much of a stimulative effect is there on the economy when 9% of mortgage debtors suddenly save the $1000 - $2000 per month they used to be wasting on a mortgage? Honey, I stopped paying the mortgage! Let's go to Disney World!
YouTube, in some sort of Canadian-whackjob-protection strategy, keeps taking down the "Take a Kayak" video. You can watch it here, for now, until Dion's goons take down that site. Watch it while you can, and record it for posterity.
In the interest of preserving the historical record in the face of the forces of darkness who would destroy it, following is a full transcript of Celine Dion's "Take a Kayak," with my favorite lines in bold:
I'm waking up in the morning, I'm having a coffee, I barely can swallow it. I come here, at Caesar's Palace every night, to perform. I barely can sing. But for respect, for the people who come, I am still singing.
When I come home at night, my son is waiting for me. I watch television. Yes, we gave a million dollar. But what we expect, what I want to look, like the rest of the world, I open the television. There's people still there, waiting to be rescued, and for me it's not acceptable. I know there's reasons for it. I'm sorry to say I'm being rude, but I don't wanna hear those reasons.
You know, some people are stealing and they're making a big deal out of it. "Oh, they're stealing twenty pair of jeans," or "they're stealing television sets." Who cares? They're not gonna go too far with it. Maybe those people are so poor, some of the people who do that, they're so poor they've never touched anything in their lives. Let them touch those things for once!
The main thing right now, it's not the people who are stealing, it's the people who are left there, and they're watching helicopsters flying over their heads, and they're praying. How come it's so easy to send planes in another country to kill everyone in a second, to destroy lives?
We need to serve our country, and for me to serve our country is to be there right now to rescue the rest of the people. We need the cash, we need the blood, we need the support, right now we need the prayers. It is -- you know, when I was hearing a couple of days ago that these things are not reachable, it's too full of water. Maybe I'm too much like my -- I'm not thinking with my head. I'm talking with my heart. Nobody can open any roofs. The helicopters flying in. Take two people at a time. Take a kayak! Go into those walls.
There's kids being raped at night. We hear gunshots, big guns, what's that? Those people are praying, they're walking, they're like this: "Hello? Do you see us? We're still alive. But we're dying!"
It's terrible. I do not want to talk to you about money.
(Q on talking to her son about it)
Well, I have to say that Renee Charles, yeah, Renee Charles knows because he sometimes watches televisions with me and I'm saying to him, "Those people went through a big storm and they will be fine," because I know at the end they'll be fine, and I hope and I'm -- we're all praying for them. I'm trying not to put to Renee Charles something so dramatic and that's why I'm sorry for crying so hard because I'm holding it for the last week.
And I'm trying to to tell my son that everything's gonna be OK but I see those mothers over there, they're like Cheese Whiz! You know, it's awful.
(Q on donating a million dollars)
I understand it's very important because eventually we will need that money. But it's just very frustrating that Franco and Conscience West and me all bill one million dollar. This is one thing. In 3 months, in 6 months, they will need that money. Right now, they're praying for water. So we need to send them the water. They don't care about my check. So, it's just frustrating because on our part of the world, we're trying our best and we're expecting those people -- errrfffff!!! -- I'm sorry.
Meanwhile, back in reality,
... the bond market is doing its best impression of Kim Jong-Il.
But since it is their guy in office, the laws of the land don't matter. The Constitution doesn't matter. The GM bond holders don't matter.
Who knew that Yes We Can:
- ignore the Constitution
- violate individual rights
- destroy a representative democracy
- put the USA on a path of destruction
It's a high-quality, professional, self-inking stamp. The idea is to stamp "TAX CHEAT!" in red ink over Timmy the Tax Cheat's signature on dollar bills (which doesn't appear to violate the defacement law). I highly recommend it. Buy them now for 4th of July gifts. Only problem is I don't have any Geithner bills in my wallet yet. I don't even have any evil Hank Paulsons, just a bunch of John Snows.
The maker of the stamps received an IRS audit shortly after launching the web site. Coincidence? I think not. So to make it easier on you Sheithner minions, "W.C. Varones" is a pseudonym. My real name is Anthony Adams, and I am a freshman state Assemblyman from Southern California. Look at me. Do you think anyone could get this fat eating on an honest Assemblyman's salary?
Timmy is a lying scumbag and truly exemplifies the coup that has taken place. We are no longer a democracy; we are an oligarchy and the politburo is the Fed. Party members in good standing will profit while party members in poor standing will pay. George Orwell would be proud.
They have so much friggin' money that they can only invest in things that have almost infinite supply. At the top of that list would be U.S. debt.
Seems to me only a matter of time before they go on a real estate binge. Africa has resources and can be picked up on the cheap. Why not snap up some Indonesian islands, too? And California has hundreds of miles of coastline that would make a nice vacation spot for party leaders. If you wanted to snap up California, though, you'd crash the dollar first to make it even cheaper. And who holds enough U.S. currency and debt to crash the dollar?
Yes, it's a massive tax on the poor. But, like Barack Obama, I share the Roman Senate's attitude toward the poor:
Yes, global warming is a hoax. But reducing energy consumption has other benefits, including protecting the environment and slowing the flow of dollars to terrorist nations.
Yes, it's a huge new tax. But I'd rather discourage consumption with consumption taxes than income or investment with income or investment taxes.
Yes, cap and trade is bad policy. But after trillion dollar Wall Street bailouts, perpetual trillion-dollar deficits, and the nationalization of the financial, auto, and soon health-care industries, cap and trade is having a hard time finding room in my outrage budget.
UPDATE: I could be wrong. Another libertarian's view. While politicians worry about voters' "bailout fatigue," I'm suffering a related but somewhat opposite syndrome: I've seen so much horror recently that I can't react appropriately to new horrors. Call it Post-Socialist Stress Disorder.
HT: Mohawk Chieftain
Instead of seeing older workers staying on the job longer as the economy has worsened, the Social Security system is reporting a major surge in early retirement claims that could have implications for the financial security of millions of baby boomers.
Since the current federal fiscal year began Oct. 1, claims have been running 25% ahead of last year, compared with the 15% increase that had been projected as the post-World War II generation reaches eligibility for early retirement, according to Stephen C. Goss, chief actuary for the Social Security Administration.
Many of the additional retirements are probably laid-off workers who are claiming Social Security early, despite reduced benefits, because they are under immediate financial pressure, Goss and other analysts believe.
The ramifications of the trend are profound for the new retirees, their families, the government and other social institutions that may be called upon to help support them.
On top of savings ravaged by the stock market decline and the loss of home equity, many retirees now must make do with Social Security benefits reduced by as much as 25% if they retire at age 62 instead of 66.
"When the recession ends and the economy bounces back, there may be a band of people for whom things will never be the same again. They'll still be paying the price for 10, 20, 30 years down the road," said Cristina Martin Firvida, director of economic security for AARP, the nation's largest membership organization for people 50 and older.
The full consequences of retirement decisions made in hard times will become apparent when people who retired early begin to exhaust their savings.
"As they get into their 70s and 80s, it will be increasingly inadequate," said Alicia H. Munnell, director of the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College.
The most severe effect will probably fall on the unemployed widows of workers who retire early, Munnell said. Survivors' benefits also take a deeper cut when people retire early -- reduced as much as 30% for retirement at 62. Because women tend to live longer than men, that leaves them more vulnerable to running out of money as expenses for assisted living and other costs rise in advanced old age.
You think the boomers are screwed? Wait 'til you see the Gen X'ers try to retire. My Social Security statement shows I'm projected to receive benefits that would barely cover property taxes in my town. Never mind little things like food and utilities. And Gen X doesn't have pensions (government worker overclass excepted). Some diligent Gen X'ers max out their 401(k)s -- but the $15,500 max won't provide much of a comfortable retirement unless they started in their 20's and are fortunate to get long-term investment returns well above the rate of inflation. And they are starting in a hole after the investment returns of the last 10 years.
So we do what our parents did -- buy a house and hope perpetual asset inflation will bail us out. Hope that the great Ponzi scheme lasts one more generation.
If foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, libertarians are small-minded indeed. We believe that people should be free both in their personal lives and in their economic interactions. Any government beyond the minimum necessary to protect life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness is probably detrimental to those goals.
Modern-day liberalism has not been thought to have such a consistent theme. It appears to be a mishmash of grievance, entitlement, guilt, envy, group identification, deification of elected leaders, and love of big government.
Until now. I believe the unifying theme of modern-day liberal positions is the inability to recognize the incentive effect.
The media and liberals (but I repeat myself) have a myopia where they obsess on first-order effects and do not recognize second-order effects. Incentive effects are a complete mystery to them. A famous example is the do-gooder group that wanted to mandate that parents purchase airline seats for infants. Obviously, on the extremely remote chance that the plane crashes, an infant may be safer to be restrained in a seat than in a parent's lap... assuming that the plane crash is mild enough for people to survive at all. Well, that's all fine and good, but they failed to consider that if you raise the cost of flying by requiring additional ticket purchases, you might price some people out of flying and into driving. And the odds of dying while driving hundreds of miles on American freeways are a lot higher than dying on a commercial airline flight.
This is very similar to the liberal myopia seen on a myriad of public policy issues, such as welfare dependency and the economy-stifling effect of high taxes. Liberals want to treat the immediate symptom without considering the long-term consequences. Take California for example, where the liberals in the legislature think that they can always raise taxes even higher without driving anyone out of business or out of state.
If we ignore the incentive effect entirely, we can arrive at Utopia: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need." Let's see how that works in California shortly.
While the effect seems strongest on economic issues, it interestingly also applies on non-economic issues. Gun control and criminal sentencing, for example, are both issues where the traditional liberal position is that which minimizes the value of the incentive effect (i.e. crime deterrence).
I'm not saying that liberals are wrong on all of these issues. Indeed, I agree with them in opposition to the death penalty, because I believe the deterrent effect is both minimal and greatly outweighed by other arguments. But it is pretty interesting how well most liberal positions line up pretty well with the blind-to-incentives position.
Come to think of it, the General Theory of Liberalism applies to illegal immigration, too. Amnesty is a perfectly nice thing to do for illegal aliens, but it creates a tremendous incentive for more illegal immigration, especially since 20+ years after the first "one-time only" amnesty, the border is still laughably insecure and we are debating further amnesties more seriously than mass deportations.
Mary K. Letourneau, a former teacher who pled guilty to raping then-elementary student Vili Fualaau, is hosting the event Saturday at the Fuel Sports Bar in Seattle's Pioneer Square neighborhood.
Fualaau, now Letourneau's husband, will be DJ that night.
Strategic Cap Bank's
Strategerie failed badly
Sheila pops Champaign
The remains were bought by Midland States Bank of Effingham. Effingham. How would you like to be from Effing Effingham?
UPDATE: Citizens National Bank of Macomb, IL, too!
Strategic and Citizens
Bair and Suze move fast
Final obvious point: I don't want to sound like Veronique de Rugy here, but who will pay the price
ifwhen this half-baked "restructuring" fails? In normal "capitalism at work," those who would pay the price will be those who made the deal and put up their money--the capitalists. (Query: Would [Obama Motors cheerleader] Scott Sperling invest his firm's money in this dubious proposition?) IfWhen Obama's plan fails, the monetary loss will fall not on Obama, but on the taxpayers. It will likely be made up somehow by the taxpayers (via higher tax assessments or inflation). That's not "capitalism at work." It's something else at work. But I'd be all for it, if I thought it really would work. It won't, and it will be Obama's fault. (He'd certainly get credit if it succeeded.)
This one's been in the works for months -- the Feds have been leaning on BankUnited (BKUNA to stock jockeys) to find a buyer. And the buyers are a bunch of private equity guys, who are getting the taxpayer to take on almost all the risk:
The government will take 80 per cent of the first $4bn in losses and 95 per cent of any remaining losses, people familiar with the transaction said.
Why they did it on a Thursday instead of the usual Friday, I don't know. Maybe Sheila and Suze want to make it a four-day romantic holiday weekend in Florida.
Thanks to Negocios Loucos for the heads up.
Last night, a tired and still obviously delusional Macke wandered onto the scene of a terrorist plot bust in Riverdale:
Macke was last seen late last night near Broadway, accosting a theater-goer and screaming, "Where's the ibogaine, Kenneth?" Anyone with information on Macke's whereabouts is asked to call Dr. Raoul Duke at (212) 562-1000.
Oh wait I got that totally wrong, my bad! See here:
High-ranking House Democrats are urging the Treasury Department to prop up minority-owned broadcasters suffering from a lack of capital and lost advertising revenue amid the economic slump.
Sorry, so if you are any of those races listed above then you deserve money from the government. If you are white than screw you because some animals are more equal than others.
NL Disclaimer: I believe in total equality - no bailouts for anyone.
Tonight, we repudiated Schwarzenegger. Now on to the bigger challenge: stopping Obama's Bailout Nation.
Don't forget to vote, and if you're free this evening, there's a victory party at Seau's in Mission Valley.
The Washington Post elaborates:
Long derided by American conservatives as "socialist" and praised by the left for its generous government spending, Canada is casting off those stereotypes. Over the past few years, while U.S. politicians presided over huge increases in spending and debt, the Canadian government tightened its belt, slashed tax rates and balanced budgets.
Click on over to the WaPo and click through the charts. Bottom line? Canada is resource-rich, fiscally prudent, and has actual assets in its pension funds. The U.S. depends on other countries for natural resources, is a fiscal disaster, exports mainly debt and derivatives, and has a Social Security Ponzi scheme for a pension plan. And while Obama throws future generations under the bus to bail out today's Wall Street fatcats, Canada's banks are relatively sound.
I've spoken fondly of Australian fiscal and monetary policy in the past. Canada is in the same league. If you have any Canadian or Aussie connections, try to get yourself a permanent residency there before they close the borders. If you can't move, stocking up on Aussie and Hoser currencies and equities is the next best thing.
Did Hillary put Banky up to this?
Maureen Dowd, Pulitizer [sic] Prize winner. Today. New York Times:
More and more the timeline is raising the question of why, if the torture was to prevent terrorist attacks, it seemed to happen mainly during the period when the Bush crowd was looking for what was essentially political information to justify the invasion of Iraq.
Josh Marshall. [Left-wing (but you knew that if the NYT is reading him)] Blogger. Last Thursday. Talking Points Memo:
More and more the timeline is raising the question of why, if the torture was to prevent terrorist attacks, it seemed to happen mainly during the period when we were looking for what was essentially political information to justify the invasion of Iraq.
Xerox Mo Dowd came up with a silly story about how, while she hadn't read the left-wing blog post, a friend of hers had, and, in the course of casual political discussions, suggested that Dowd explore the idea in her column. Not explained was how a lengthy and complex sentence was transcribed almost word-for-word from blog to friend to Dowd to column.
The L.A. Times could learn from this. Doddering old fool George Skelton would make a lot more sense if he stopped trying to come up with his own bizarre columns denying reality and brown-nosing tax-hiking politicians and just start copying and pasting from left-wing blogs.
Now in more or less chronological order. The "doors opened at 3pm" with the official start at 4pm. I arrived at 3:00 and we were already into the overflow parking lots. On the way in:
While the vast majority of the signs were anti-1A, anti-Schwarzenegger, anti-tax, and anti-spending, there were a few folks supporting related issues such as stopping illegal immigration and legalizing marijuana. This guy and his buddies were partying it up in a prime parking spot at the entrance to the event.
Before the storm:
The good folks at Recall Anthony Adams were set up early:
And in front of the next booth, someone with a creative "Arnold is 1A-hole" message talks to Colleen of TotalRecall2009:
The Shredex truck, into whose shredder many Schwarzenegger likenesses were fed:
I didn't notice him at the time, but there's a sheikh in the crowd:
Righteous indignation at Schwarzenegger's terrorist threats:
Capitalism in action (though at that price, they're probably selling like Government Motors cars):
A little irony here. The bumper sticker supports Nathan Fletcher, a Republican weenie legislator who supported the backroom tax-hike deal.
This lady was a real artist. Side 1:
And side 2:
A naked, upside down Schwarzenegger effigy was used as a piñata for kids to smash to pieces...
... followed by a clothed, right-side-up effigy, which was also smashed to pieces.
One of the lucky many to catch a free T-shirt being thrown into the crowd by KFI staff:
This guy made good use of a sign from Schwarzenegger's original campaign. And there's that sheikh again. Is he following me?
Ordered by Congress to "buy American" when spending money from the $787 billion stimulus package, the town of Peru, Ind., stunned its Canadian supplier by rejecting sewage pumps made outside of Toronto. After a Navy official spotted Canadian pipe fittings in a construction project at Camp Pendleton, Calif., they were hauled out of the ground and replaced with American versions. In recent weeks, other Canadian manufacturers doing business with U.S. state and local governments say they have been besieged with requests to sign affidavits pledging that they will only supply materials made in the USA.Can you say "Smoot-Hawley?"
Outrage spread in Canada, with the Toronto Star last week bemoaning "a plague of protectionist measures in the U.S." and Canadian companies openly fretting about having to shift jobs to the United States to meet made-in-the-USA requirements. This week, the Canadians fired back. A number of Ontario towns, with a collective population of nearly 500,000, retaliated with measures effectively barring U.S. companies from their municipal contracts -- the first shot in a larger campaign that could shut U.S. companies out of billions of dollars worth of Canadian projects.
For those of you who couldn't make it, the live KFI broadcast from 4pm - 7pm is online here.
Pics to follow.
[Obama health care policy adviser Dr. Ezekiel] Emanuel has embraced a technique for simplifying some of the tough calls: age discrimination. He wrote in The Lancet in 2008: “Unlike allocation by sex or race, allocation by age is not invidious discrimination.” We all were young once, the argument goes, so denying the elderly and weak in order to care for the young and fit is just.
Soylent Green is people!!!
The owners of a local mortgage company were found dead of apparent suicides within hours of each other Thursday night, leaving those who knew them wondering if a bad economy and hard hit mortgage industry were too much for them to take.
Lee Stamper, whose daughter works at the company, said he was aware of employees being owed back pay, but they were unwilling to report the issue because they needed the job. He also claimed that Deely and Patrick recently had a falling out and Patrick hinted about possibly killing herself earlier this week.
“It looks like a money flow problem,” he said.
Greenspan's Body Count now stands at ninety-five:
Del Mar man
Wayne "Mike" Anderson
Jeffrey M. Pearson
Ervin Antonio Lupoe
Steven L. Good
Dallas Dwayne Carter
Lt. Michael Howe
Palmer C. White
Dianne Pittman White
Edwin F. Rachleff
Scott M. Coles
Dawn E. Armstrong
Jonathon Calvin "40-Cal" Jacques
Little Boy X
Little Girl X
Rufus Shaw Jr.
Lynn Flint Shaw
President Barack Obama, calling current deficit spending “unsustainable,” warned of skyrocketing interest rates for consumers if the U.S. continues to finance government by borrowing from other countries.
“We can’t keep on just borrowing from China,” Obama said at a town-hall meeting in Rio Rancho, New Mexico, outside Albuquerque. “We have to pay interest on that debt, and that means we are mortgaging our children’s future with more and more debt.”
Meanwhile, back in Washington:
Bonus Skelton today: he's becoming really unhinged that his beloved Prop 1A is losing.
We are going into the mouth of Hell for Saturday's No on 1A rally, to the city of Corona in the Inland Empire.
Different parts of the Inland Empire have different detractions: San Bernardino's is urban decay, crime, vandalism, and abandonment; Riverside's is smog and parking-lot freeways. Corona's curse is that the whole town smells like cow manure -- always, and strongly so.
It speaks volumes about our determination to crush the Taxinator that we would go so far as to spend a few hours in Corona.
Who watches the watchmen?
"Let's [Republicans] invade and let's cross over that (political) center," he said. "The issues that they're [Democrats] talking about? Let them be our issues, and let the party be known for that."
Mission accomplished, Governor.
Blacks, liberals, Democrats, and Bay Area voters support it.
All the other measures are failing, too, except 1F which would stop pay raises for legislators in deficit years. Details here.
Despite being outspent roughly 8-to-1, the rebels are getting the truth out about the Prop 1A fraud. The polls are strongly against 1A, and getting stronger.
Here's the first No on 1A television ad:
From Obama's January pork marketing piece, via Innocent Bystanders.