Hear it from the mouth of the "beneficiary." Is this the country you want? Is this good for the recipients?
Incentives, people. Incentives.
HT: Mish.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular
-
Only the police should have guns, you know. The shocking double murder of a young couple in Irvine turns out to have been suspectedly com...
-
Joshua Lazerson in The Coast News : An open letter to Darrell Issa I have lived in Encinitas for the past 23 years, so you have served a...
-
August 2010 : Intel Bets Its Chips on McAfee. Tech Giant Strikes $7.68 Billion Deal for Security-Software Maker, Drawing Mixed Reaction ...
-
Boris Johnson was just named the UK Foreign Secretary. This is going to be awesome. He's like a Nigel Farage understudy. FT : Bori...
-
Is David Cameron Great Britain's George Washington?
-
You probably know that CalPERS recently reported yet another year of investment results that fell far short of its absurd promises. But d... -
Douche Bank fails to deliver gold to ETF owners. If you can't hold it in your hand, you don't own gold. If you own a gold ETF, se...
-
Trump supporter Sean O'Loughlin in a press release : Donald Trump lives, works, eats and employs people of all races and religions. ... -
Ohio State Lantern : No virgins for you, Abdul! Ten people were taken to hospitals after the ambush, but none of the injuries were co...
StatCounter
3 comments:
Would you know a plant if it were growing out of your butt?
There's 45 million Americans on food stamps.
That's a lot more than the number of credible actresses out there.
I wondered if "Lacy" was a plant. That said, in 1966, yes, 1966, I began advocating the "one and you're done" plan. Whaaaat? Yes, if you have a child while on welfare, you are given 30 days to decide: an end to all welfare payments for you and your child, for life. Or sterilization. This will come, or we will have a civil war. Imagine if this plan had been adopted in 1966 how few food stamp recipients we would have today. Five million, as opposed to 48 million?
Post a Comment