A Shelby County husband and father has been found guilty in the slaying of his longtime friend who was shot multiple times in the stairwell of her Highland Lakes home in 2016 and found dead by her young son.Greenspan's Body Count stands at 266.
After only one hour of deliberation Tuesday, the jury convicted 39-year-old Adam Michael Burrus in the murder of Connie Woolweaver, a beloved mother of two. Investigators found nine shell casings and eight bullet fragments near her body and said one of the shots entered through the back of her head and exited through her eye.
Woolweaver, according to testimony, had loaned Burrus a total of $176,000 and was calling in those loans. A week before her death, Woolweaver text messaged a friend, saying she was not going to talk with Burrus until he repaid her. Burrus had repaid her about $47,000, of which $43,000 was borrowed from a bank.
Shelby County authorities earlier this year indicted Burrus on mortgage fraud. It is not clear if that indictment is related to the $43,000 loan.
Burrus, prosecutors said, was feeling the pressure and saw killing Woolweaver as a means of escaping his money problems. “If you take care of Connie Woolweaver, you take care of the debt,’’ said Shelby County Assistant District Attorney Daniel McBrayer.
5.15.2019
Greenspan's Body Count: Connie Woolweaver
Alabama:
4.15.2019
4.04.2019
3.21.2019
Nailed it!
If the Gimp crawls out of his cage and sees his shadow, there will be 6 more weeks of #BTFD! https://t.co/X440gw1OVd— W.C. Varones (@wcvarones) January 30, 2019
3.15.2019
The science is settled
On incentives in science:
“It is just not true that the scientists try to minimize the effects of radiation,” Thomas added. “ It would actually be against their own best interests to do this. They are mostly academics and are required to produce large amounts of money and papers for their Institutes. You would be expecting them to argue for larger effects of radiation as the more serious the health consequences the more the money flows.”
3.14.2019
Stephen Moore repeats the Menzie Chinn fallacy
In 2014, economics professor and Obama fanboy Menzie Chinn suggested that Obama's 3.1% GDP growth forecast was reasonable because the US had grown at that rate in the late 20th century. He gave absolutely no consideration to the enormous contribution of credit growth to 20th century GDP, and the unlikelihood (impossibility) of that explosion in credit to be repeated now.
Proving that both sides can have equally stupid partisan shills, here's Trump fanboy Stephen Moore in the WSJ:
We're not going to get sustained 3% to 4% real GDP growth.
Proving that both sides can have equally stupid partisan shills, here's Trump fanboy Stephen Moore in the WSJ:
Skeptics in and out of the Fed still think sustained 3% to 4% growth is out of reach. Nonsense. The combination of stable prices and sharp tax cuts in the 1980s produced an average of 4% growth for seven years. Imagine if we had a similar stretch of sustained growth, with low inflation and rising wages.Just as Menzie did, Moore completely ignores the vastly different debt and demographic conditions between 1980 and now.
We're not going to get sustained 3% to 4% real GDP growth.
3.04.2019
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Why does America keep winning?
X : Yes. But also, America's abundance of natural resources and history of fortuitous developments kinda seems like God shed His grace o...
