On Wednesday, the central planners at the Federal Reserve announced that they will continue distorting the markets by manipulating interest rates to near-zero at least through 2014.
Gold took off like a rocket, rising more than $50 intraday.
Stocks, the object of Ben Bernanke's obsession, didn't keep up, rising only one percent and then fading the next day.
There is a stunning amount of ignorance and misinformation about gold among the public, the financial press, and economists. Remember when banker Richard Wiggins trashed gold at $1200 in Barron's? And witness the ignorance in the comments here, including from economist Barkley Rosser, about gold being in a bubble in 2010 at $1200. Personal finance guru Dave Ramsey, who is otherwise generally outstanding, has been telling people to dump gold for years, including here in October 2009 with gold at $1000.
Many people think of gold as an inflation hedge, and can't understand why gold goes up while the CPI is flat. The truth is that gold is a hedge against currency debasement, which is a very different thing than consumer inflation. The CPI remains contained for two reasons: 1) depressed demand and 2) biased index construction.
After a multi-decade borrowing and spending orgy, consumers are tapped out and are trying to repair their balance sheets. So even as the Fed prints money, consumers don't spend enough to create significant inflation. And while there is inflation in the things consumers need (food, gas, utilities), it is masked by the price drops in discretionary items like flat screens and cheap Chinese crap. Additionally, the BLS makes "quality" (cars now have airbags and ABS brakes, so we're going to pretend prices didn't increase as much) and "substitution" (steak is so expensive that nobody eats it anymore, so we'll take it out of the index and replace it with hamburger) adjustments that systematically reduce reported CPI inflation.
So if CPI inflation doesn't explain the increase in gold prices, what does?
Two things: the national debt and the Federal Reserve balance sheet. Here's a history of gold along with U.S. debt as measured by the IMF's Gross Government Debt. Pretty compelling, huh?
We are now in our fourth year of trillion-dollar deficits, and the debt/GDP ratio just passed 100%. The dollar is falling against gold because that debt can't possibly be paid off, or even the interest serviced, in today's dollars. Interest and maturing debt are paid by issuing more debt! And the cowardly Congressional Republicans have folded on the debt ceiling and the budget continuing resolution and agreed to keep spending even more than we did under Reid/Pelosi/Obama. Unless you think Congress is going to reverse course and start running budget surpluses, that white line is headed higher. I'll leave it to you to judge what that implies for the gold line.
As for the Federal Reserve's effect on gold, here's a chart of the Federal Reserve balance sheet (essentially the amount of money it has printed out of thin air) along with gold prices.
The Fed's Wednesday declaration of free money for three years is not an explicit promise of further balance sheet expansion, but it's an indication that that is the direction that the Fed is leaning. And with the Treasury still running trillion-dollar deficits, somebody's got to buy all that new debt. The Fed is likely to continue being the Treasury's handmaiden, especially if foreign buyers continue backing away. Remember the old days where everyone was talking about the Fed "exit strategy?" You haven't heard that phrase lately, have you? Funny how that is.
I've said it before and I'll say it again: the dollar is a convenient medium of exchange but it is absolutely NOT a store of value. Any financial adviser who doesn't recommend gold as an essential part of a balanced portfolio is recklessly irresponsible.
Body Count goes to Vegas! Ernest Scherer III was a Vegas loser who fancied himself a professional poker player. Doesn't that photo t...
UPDATE: Edited to remove the guy's name. I hope nobody harasses him or his employer. He was good-natured and his sign was innocuous a...
WSJ : Calpers’ stock portfolio returned minus 13.1%, while bonds returned minus 14.5%, the pension fund said. Those losses delivered a doub...