7.02.2012

Roberts bowed to political pressure from East Coast elitist media; switched vote on ObamaCare

... and got publicly outed for it by outraged Supreme Court insiders:
Some of the conservatives, such as Justice Clarence Thomas, deliberately avoid news articles on the Court when issues are pending (and avoid some publications altogether, such as The New York Times). They've explained that they don't want to be influenced by outside opinion or feel pressure from outlets that are perceived as liberal.

But Roberts pays attention to media coverage. As Chief Justice, he is keenly aware of his leadership role on the Court, and he also is sensitive to how the Court is perceived by the public.

There were countless news articles in May warning of damage to the Court - and to Roberts' reputation - if the Court were to strike down the mandate. Leading politicians, including the President himself, had expressed confidence the mandate would be upheld.

How's that upholding the prestige of the Court by making a craven, politically motivated, legally tortured ruling working out for you, Johnny Boy?

Not so well.
Public opinion of the Supreme Court has grown more negative since the highly publicized ruling on the president’s health care law was released. A growing number now believe that the high court is too liberal and that justices pursue their own agenda rather than acting impartially.

A week ago, 36% said the court was doing a good or an excellent job. That’s down to 33% today. However, the big change is a rise in negative perceptions. Today, 28% say the Supreme Court is doing a poor job. That’s up 11 points over the past week.

2 comments:

Doo Doo Econ said...

See Dred Scott v. Sandford. Thanks John.

Jim said...

Roberts is an old corporate/government whore of a lawyer. This was pressure from his old pals at Money Inc. This story is spin to deflect from the actual influence.

Love your blog. Keep giving them hell.

Happy Super Tuesday!