The superficial aspects – anecdotal accounts of outrageous pension manipulation – have received the most media attention. Meanwhile, the more meaningful issue of whether taxpayers and employees face a ticking time bomb of unfunded liabilities is complex and unsexy, receiving relatively little attention.
For the most part, Brown's plan deals with the former rather than the latter. It gives the illusion of being tough on pension issues without making truly tough choices.
Much of it deals, for instance, with "pension spiking" through various manipulative techniques – outrageous, certainly, but of little effect on the larger and more serious issue. Other points are of equally light weight, such as prohibiting retroactive pension benefits or pensions for convicted felons.
Meanwhile, the plan either omits anything that would touch the larger issue of unfunded liability or places it in the category of "under development."
Jerry Brown is a fluffer
Dan Walters, the Sacramento Bee's top state government columnist and certainly no conservative, says Jerry Brown's pension plan is nothing but fluff:
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
Body Count goes to Vegas! Ernest Scherer III was a Vegas loser who fancied himself a professional poker player. Doesn't that photo tell ...
UPDATE: Edited to remove the guy's name. I hope nobody harasses him or his employer. He was good-natured and his sign was innocuous a...
Maybe teaching racial division and hatred wasn't such a good idea after all
Doctor cycling in California run down, stabbed by driver screaming about ‘white privilege’ : A doctor cycling along the Pacific Coast Highwa...
The overall point is valid, but I believe pension spiking is systematic. I remember hearing that something like 80% of eligible workers (police, firefighters, etc. but not teachers that I know of) do it and that it can almost double your retirement.
Post a Comment